Genetics and Genomics Rankings of US University

List of universities in US that offer Genetics and Genomics Masters and PhD degrees. Rankings are based on NRC.Genetics and Genomics Rankings

No	University	R-Rank	S-Rank
1	MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY	[1-2]	[1-3]
2	COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK	[2-10]	[2-11]
3	JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY	[2-10]	[7-32]
4	STANFORD UNIVERSITY	[2-8]	[1-6]
5	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY	[2-6]	[1-7]
6	YALE UNIVERSITY	[3-14]	[4-18]
7	BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE	[4-15]	[3-15]
8	UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR	[4-18]	[3-14]
9	UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL	[4-12]	[4-19]
10	UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON	[5-21]	[5-27]
11	BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY	[6-28]	[18-47]
12	UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA	[6-32]	[7-34]
13	UNIV. TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON	[7-27]	[9-38]
14	DUKE UNIVERSITY	[8-22]	[5-26]
15	UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS	[8-27]	[5-25]
16	WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS	[8-24]	[6-29]
17	CORNELL UNIVERSITY	[9-23]	[9-39]
18	EMORY UNIVERSITY	[10-29]	[12-41]
19	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-LOS ANGELES	[10-26]	[7-36]
20	OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS	[12-30]	[10-34]
21	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN FRANCISCO	[12-36]	[19-53]
22	NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY	[13-38]	[13-44]
23	UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO	[14-31]	[9-36]
24	CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY	[15-37]	[17-47]
25	UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON	[15-32]	[16-45]
26	PENN STATE UNIVERSITY	[17-42]	[8-33]
27	TUFTS UNIVERSITY	[17-36]	[8-35]
28	UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA	[17-39]	[14-44]
29	UNIVERSITY OF UTAH	[17-43]	[45-61]
30	STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT STONY BROOK	[18-39]	[12-45]
31	UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA	[19-40]	[24-52]
32	IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY	[20-40]	[11-43]
33	UNIVERSITY OF IOWA	[20-40]	[15-48]
34	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-DAVIS	[21-40]	[28-56]
35	UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-LOS ANGELES	[23-51]	[18-48]
36	UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH CAMPUS	[26-50]	[5-28]
37	THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY	[27-50]	[19-54]
38	NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY	[28-46]	[31-57]
39	TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY	[30-52]	[24-53]
40	MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY	[31-52]	[24-53]
41	INDIANA UNIVERSITY AT BLOOMINGTON	[32-53]	[26-59]
42	OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY	[32-53]	[24-55]
43	DREXEL UNIVERSITY	[33-54]	[24-55]
44	NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY	[33-51]	[32-58]
45	UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA	[33-50]	[34-57]
46	IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY	[34-52]	[24-55]
47	UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – COLUMBIA	[34-54]	[14-49]
48	WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY	[34-55]	[19-52]
49	UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER	[35-56]	[22-55]
50	TEMPLE UNIVERSITY	[36-56]	[37-60]
51	UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT	[37-57]	[26-57]
52	WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY	[37-58]	[15-52]
53	UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT DENVER AND HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER	[43-56]	[41-60]
54	NEW YORK UNIVERSITY	[44-58]	[26-58]
55	INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS	[46-58]	[42-59]
56	VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY	[48-62]	[36-59]
57	UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT	[49-61]	[56-63]
58	NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS	[50-65]	[57-64]
59	CLEMSON UNIVERSITY	[53-62]	[47-61]
60	OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY	[56-64]	[36-60]
61	UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT	[56-63]	[60-64]
62	WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY	[56-63]	[51-63]
63	UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE	[59-65]	[65-65]
64	UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS	[60-65]	[62-64]
65	UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE	[60-65]	[35-60]
66	HOWARD UNIVERSITY	[Not Ranked-Not Ranked]	[Not Ranked-Not Ranked]

• S Rank (for survey-based rankings) are based on how faculty weighted—or assigned importance to—20 characteristics that the study committee determined to be factors contributing to program quality. The weights of characteristics vary by field based on faculty survey responses in each of those fields. Programs in a field rank higher if they demonstrate strength in the characteristics carrying greater weights.
• R Rank (for regression-based rankings) depend on the weights calculated from faculty ratings of a sample of programs in their field. These ratings were related, through a multiple regression and principal components analysis, to the 20 characteristics that the committee had determined to be factors of program quality. The resulting weights were then applied to data corresponding to those characteristics for each of the programs in the field.