Food Science Rankings for US Universities


Rankings for Universities offering Food Science graduate degree programs in USA.



NoUniversity NameR-RankS-Rank
1CLEMSON UNIVERSITY[11-29][25-29]
2COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY[22-30][28-31]
3CORNELL UNIVERSITY[1-11][2-13]
4IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY[11-23][6-22]
5KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY[5-19][3-18]
6LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE[17-28][8-23]
7MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY[16-30][19-28]
8MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY[19-29][15-27]
9NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY[6-21][12-25]
10OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[2-17][2-14]
11OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[25-31][26-30]
12OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY[17-29][18-27]
13PENN STATE UNIVERSITY[8-21][3-17]
14PURDUE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[2-11][2-15]
15RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK CAMPUS[2-17][9-24]
16TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY[19-29][14-26]
17UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MAIN CAMPUS[2-16][2-10]
18UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-DAVIS[4-21][4-17]
19UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA[8-24][9-24]
20UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA[2-17][2-11]
21UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN[2-20][7-22]
22UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK[10-23][6-21]
23UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST[1-9][1-1]
24UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA-TWIN CITIES[3-17][15-25]
25UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – COLUMBIA[24-31][30-31]
26UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA – LINCOLN[8-21][8-22]
27UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE[17-30][19-28]
28UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT[21-31][22-29]
29UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON[1-11][3-16]
30VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY[9-24][7-24]
31WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY[4-21][2-14]


  • S Rank (for survey-based rankings) are based on how faculty weighted—or assigned importance to—20 characteristics that the study committee determined to be factors contributing to program quality. The weights of characteristics vary by field based on faculty survey responses in each of those fields. Programs in a field rank higher if they demonstrate strength in the characteristics carrying greater weights.
  • R Rank (for regression-based rankings) depend on the weights calculated from faculty ratings of a sample of programs in their field. These ratings were related, through a multiple regression and principal components analysis, to the 20 characteristics that the committee had determined to be factors of program quality. The resulting weights were then applied to data corresponding to those characteristics for each of the programs in the field.