Industrial Engineering US University Rankings


Industrial Engineering universities rankings in USA. Rankings is based on NRC Survey.

Industrial Engineering Rankings

NoUniversityR-RankS-Rank
1STANFORD UNIVERSITY[1-1][1-4]
2GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[2-2][2-6]
3CORNELL UNIVERSITY[3-11][3-11]
4PURDUE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[3-14][6-23]
5UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY[3-9][5-22]
6UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR[3-9][9-27]
7UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON[3-13][12-29]
8OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[4-19][14-36]
9UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA[4-17][13-26]
10VIRGINIA Tech[5-23][17-38]
11NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY[6-17][2-9]
12PENN STATE UNIVERSITY[6-19][6-21]
13MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[7-34][1-2]
14UNIVERSITY OF IOWA[7-29][5-26]
15CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY[8-30][7-21]
16UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA[9-38][12-36]
17PENN STATE UNIVERSITY[10-33][14-30]
18LEHIGH UNIVERSITY[11-31][32-52]
19UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA[11-34][9-29]
20NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY[12-36][24-47]
21TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY[13-38][24-44]
22UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON[13-38][31-50]
23CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY[14-48][45-60]
24UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH CAMPUS[14-44][24-44]
25CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY[15-42][6-26]
26OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY[15-52][41-58]
27UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA[15-45][6-30]
28UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – COLUMBIA[15-46][39-59]
29OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[17-45][31-50]
30UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MAIN CAMPUS[17-53][18-45]
31COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK[18-46][9-27]
32UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN[18-41][30-46]
33ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY[19-46][5-21]
34PRINCETON UNIVERSITY[19-46][19-39]
35IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY[21-50][30-49]
36NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY[21-47][27-46]
37STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO[21-52][14-33]
38UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA[21-52][36-53]
39UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN[21-51][6-31]
40UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA – LINCOLN[25-58][4-21]
41CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY[26-55][55-63]
42UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK[26-65][4-23]
43UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN CAMPUS[26-55][39-57]
44AUBURN UNIVERSITY[27-56][22-45]
45RUTGERS NEW BRUNSWICK CAMPUS[29-59][35-52]
46UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA-TWIN CITIES[30-58][49-59]
47GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY[31-70][68-72]
48RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE[31-56][23-39]
49TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY[31-59][51-63]
50RUTGERS  NEW BRUNSWICK CAMPUS[34-61][20-42]
51NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY[35-64][32-50]
52UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO[35-59][5-19]
53UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL[35-60][57-64]
54BOSTON UNIVERSITY[38-65][24-44]
55NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[39-66][68-72]
56UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE[39-65][31-55]
57WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY[43-64][44-59]
58UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE[44-64][67-72]
59UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI[45-66][62-67]
60UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT[46-66][59-65]
61UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST[46-68][35-54]
62CLEMSON UNIVERSITY[47-65][43-57]
63UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ROLLA[47-67][65-69]
64UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA[48-68][60-67]
65KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY[54-69][36-56]
66UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA[54-71][48-64]
67NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[58-72][36-58]
68STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON[58-71][59-67]
69UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON[63-71][68-72]
70UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE[63-72][58-66]
71UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA[65-72][54-62]
72OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY[68-72][67-72]
73FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[Not Ranked][Not Ranked]
74MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY – BOZEMAN[Not Ranked][Not Ranked]

  • S Rank (for survey-based rankings) are based on how faculty weighted—or assigned importance to—20 characteristics that the study committee determined to be factors contributing to program quality. The weights of characteristics vary by field based on faculty survey responses in each of those fields. Programs in a field rank higher if they demonstrate strength in the characteristics carrying greater weights.
  • R Rank (for regression-based rankings) depend on the weights calculated from faculty ratings of a sample of programs in their field. These ratings were related, through a multiple regression and principal components analysis, to the 20 characteristics that the committee had determined to be factors of program quality. The resulting weights were then applied to data corresponding to those characteristics for each of the programs in the field.