Biomedical Engineering Rankings of US University


List of universities in USA that offer Graduate degree programs (Masters and PhD) in Biomedical and Bioengineering Rankings for US Universities.

Biomedical and Bioengineering Rankings

NoUniversityR-RankS-Rank
1MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[1-5][3-17]
2UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO[1-2][1-4]
3BOSTON UNIVERSITY[2-9][7-28]
4CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[2-12][1-3]
5UC BERKELEY/UC SAN FRANCISCO[2-8][1-6]
6DUKE UNIVERSITY[3-12][4-22]
7UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON[3-9][4-17]
8UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR[4-14][5-25]
9CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY[6-18][17-44]
10RICE UNIVERSITY[6-20][4-21]
11UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA[6-15][5-25]
12JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY[8-19][5-24]
13YALE UNIVERSITY[8-20][2-11]
14GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[9-23][8-35]
15UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA[9-19][7-28]
16NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY[10-21][11-38]
17UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-LOS ANGELES[12-31][5-31]
18UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK[12-27][7-27]
19UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH CAMPUS[12-26][13-41]
20UNIVERSITY OF UTAH[12-24][18-49]
21VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY[15-28][25-56]
22RUTGERS-NEW BRUNSWICK AND UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY-PISCATAWAY[16-32][34-62]
23UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA-TWIN CITIES[17-34][27-56]
24WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS[17-32][7-32]
25GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY – EMORY UNIVERSITY[19-38][10-33]
26UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE[20-44][9-39]
27COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK[21-40][10-41]
28OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY[21-48][9-31]
29UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA[21-42][12-46]
30UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-DAVIS[22-41][26-54]
31UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN[22-47][18-49]
32PENN STATE UNIVERSITY[25-51][9-38]
33TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY[25-55][33-62]
34THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY[25-56][6-33]
35UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM[25-48][37-62]
36UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL[25-48][40-64]
37ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY[26-51][37-65]
38PURDUE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[26-47][25-53]
39TULANE UNIVERSITY[26-53][68-72]
40UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO[26-55][27-59]
41UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON[26-49][16-43]
42DREXEL UNIVERSITY[27-61][35-62]
43UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER[27-50][26-57]
44CORNELL UNIVERSITY[28-49][16-49]
45OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[28-50][32-60]
46UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA[28-51][35-61]
47CLEMSON UNIVERSITY[29-52][30-63]
48UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA[32-56][36-63]
49STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT STONY BROOK[34-62][11-42]
50UNIVERSITY OF IOWA[35-56][26-55]
51UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN[38-61][26-56]
52UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT[40-60][36-64]
53RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE[42-64][34-60]
54VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY[43-63][33-65]
55VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY[44-64][42-65]
56UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS[45-63][37-66]
57CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK GRAD. CENTER[46-66][16-45]
58CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY[49-69][40-64]
59OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS[49-71][52-70]
60UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI[50-69][24-55]
61UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY[51-68][26-60]
62UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS[52-67][52-68]
63MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY[53-69][60-71]
64MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY[53-69][52-69]
65NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY[54-70][12-40]
66UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON[54-70][72-73]
67UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO[56-71][67-73]
68UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA[58-72][57-71]
69UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO[58-71][43-67]
70UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – COLUMBIA[59-71][43-68]
71UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA[67-73][64-72]
72WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY[68-73][63-72]
73UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE[69-73][48-69]
74UNIVERSITY OF AKRON[73-74][74-74]

  • S Rank (for survey-based rankings) are based on how faculty weighted—or assigned importance to—20 characteristics that the study committee determined to be factors contributing to program quality. The weights of characteristics vary by field based on faculty survey responses in each of those fields. Programs in a field rank higher if they demonstrate strength in the characteristics carrying greater weights.
  • R Rank (for regression-based rankings) depend on the weights calculated from faculty ratings of a sample of programs in their field. These ratings were related, through a multiple regression and principal components analysis, to the 20 characteristics that the committee had determined to be factors of program quality. The resulting weights were then applied to data corresponding to those characteristics for each of the programs in the field.